<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was Spags Second Choice and Other Speculation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ramsgab.com/2009/01/18/was-spags-second-choice-and-other-speculation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ramsgab.com/2009/01/18/was-spags-second-choice-and-other-speculation/</link>
	<description>The Definitive St. Louis Rams Blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:21:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: YankeeDoodleBrit</title>
		<link>http://www.ramsgab.com/2009/01/18/was-spags-second-choice-and-other-speculation/comment-page-1/#comment-2411</link>
		<dc:creator>YankeeDoodleBrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramsgab.com/2009/01/18/was-spags-second-choice-and-other-speculation/#comment-2411</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so so SO-SO glad we didn&#039;t get Garrett. Spagnuolo is a far better fit for the Rams bearing in mind our recent round one draft picks (Long, Carriker), and I would also say a much more proven too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so so SO-SO glad we didn&#8217;t get Garrett. Spagnuolo is a far better fit for the Rams bearing in mind our recent round one draft picks (Long, Carriker), and I would also say a much more proven too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

